Yes, even though ZoneAlarm does feature its engine, it still isn’t nearly as effective as the standalone Kaspersky antivirus.Īutomatic, Registry Startup, USB, manual, and scheduled – those are the scans available with ZoneAlarm antivirus. Of the 11 compression formats, it only flagged 2.įor example, Kaspersky did a far better job and stopped every single threat. But, it wasn’t as effective against compressed files. The antivirus did a great job of preventing us from downloading virus files and blocked drive-by downloads. In our own in-house tests, we used the EICAR files to check real-world efficiency. So, in many ways, it’s still the same software. It’s important to note that AV-Test checked ZoneAlarm Antivirus 15.0 the most recent edition is 15.4. The latest version, however, is much less demanding of system resources. That’s mainly because of the high system impact this antivirus used to have. In the fake positives test, it also performed flawlessly (6/6) in the performance test, it received a 5/6 rating. With a 100% detection-elimination rate, it earned a perfect 6/6 score. True, a lot has changed over the last three years, but still, let us take a quick look at how ZoneAlarm performed back then. We only have AV-Test results that date back to late 2016. Sadly, MRG Effitas and AV-Comparatives, one of the best third-party testers, haven’t yet tested this product. Reliability and Security Malware Protection Advanced zero-day protection only available with the higher tier.No parental controls or password manager.Not on par with Kaspersky in real-world tests.Online transactions safety – ZoneAlarm is a good choice for that.Users looking for a versatile antivirus product.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |